<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://utahcycling.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>2009 UCA Bylaw Amendments</title><link>http://utahcycling.com/forums/72/ShowForum.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator><item><title>Timing Chip Amenment</title><link>http://utahcycling.com/forums/thread/5394.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 22:24:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d963baa4-f251-4fa7-8df2-5dcb623c0869:5394</guid><dc:creator>bikeidaho</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><comments>http://utahcycling.com/forums/thread/5394.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://utahcycling.com/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=72&amp;PostID=5394</wfw:commentRss><description>What does everyone think about the timing chip resolution? I really was quite confused about the whole thing. I personally like the mandate of requiring chip timing use at events. However, I think they could have left it at that. What does everyone else think?&lt;br&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>